Category: software & equipment

2007-08-12

I have run into a nasty problem the past few weeks: printing my digital photos. They just do not look the same as they did on my computer. Usually, they go from vibrant to dull. It is always some problem with color.

I recently took a couple photos of my newborn son—I have taken much more than a couple, obviously—which I wanted to print out for the grandparents. I had already spent a good amount of time on my computer adjusting the color and contrast to get the photos just were I wanted them, especially for the supple skin tones on my little boy’s face.

2007-08-10

Why did I switch to digital? You would almost never hear this question actually asked in publiic anymore. It is just an assumption that everybody would switch. Yes, there are many good reasons to do so, but for me, it was fiercely practical.

In a sentence, film and processing in China are unreliable. In one of the copy cat capitals of the world, you never really know what is real and what is fake in China, including that Kodak or Fuji roll of film on the shelves. Most people ask, “How can film be fake? Film is film.” Not true. Film is specific chemicals at specific amounts on specific “papers”, and trickster Chinese film makers cut costs on chemicals. Though most people have never thought about the effects of these chemicals, they would still very easily notice the difference if they compared photographs taken with genuine and fake films. The color is washed out, giving them a bluish or gray tint, and often grainy.

But that is not all! The processing stinks too! Somehow, even the most beautiful photos turn awful in Chinese processing. My guess is the same. They cut costs by using a below standard amount of chemicals, thus leaving your photos abou the same as bad film.

2007-07-04

I have thought much about this topic the past few weeks. I have heard countless digital photographers say there is not a need for filters anymore, because the desired effects can just be edited on the computer in post-processing. Some traditional folks take it too far the other way and say that filters must be applied to the original shot and cannot be created in a computer.

I land in the middle of that debate. Some filters cannot be replaced and change the photo in such a way that would take days in the computer, if even possible in the first place. Other filters are pretty much pointless.

2007-06-24

A few days ago, my friend and I were looking at each others cameras and messing around with some of the features. It was actually quite fun comparing. I have the older Nikon D100, a 6 megapixel camera. He has a newer Canon EOS 350D (same thing as the Rebel XT, for some confusing marketing reason), a slightly larger 8 megapixel camera.

So, they are not really intended to be compared. Mine was a higher line (in its day) and his is the entry level digital SLR for Canon. Yet, I wanted to see how they differed and what had improved in digital cameras in the three year period between the release of our two cameras.

2007-06-01

I remember back when I used my dad’s Nikon that I used his zoom lens. And in high school, I know the annual staff’s lens was also a zoom. After that though, all I ever bought were fixed focal length, or “prime”, lenses (or my favorite: “fast glass”). With my Vivitar V4000, I have a Pentax-M 50mm 1:1.7. When I bought the D100, I bought with it an Nikkor 85mm 1:1.8D. I did not understand the issues digital SLRs have with focal length back then, and thought I was really buying an 85mm. But with the D100s 1.5 magnification (because the sensor is smaller than 35mm film), that 85mm really ends up acting like a 125mm. I will have to say it is great to achieve the purpose for which I bought it (people, face shots), but cannot be the only lens in the bag for very long. I soon…

2007-05-30

I started my photographic ventures on my dad’s Nikon. It had optional automatic speed adjustment, but manual aperture (aperture priority, that is). It was my early exposure to his camera that began my aperture centered approach to photography. My first camera of my very own I bought my senior year of university, 1998. I was preparing for a trip to London for New Year’s, and instead of leaping into the digitized future with everybody else (well, that is not totally true…pretty basic digital SLRs were loads of money), I took another step toward manual with my Vivitar V4000, which has done nothing but serve me well for many years, and even up to the present as a cheapo backup camera when I shooting something important. However, in December 2003, after weeping the loss of four years of ruined photographs, I knew I had to make the digital plunge. If an…

2007-05-07

The short answer: The GIMP & UFRaw

The long answer:
I am an unashamed Linux guy. You may ask, “Why not use Windows like everyone else?”, “Why not switch to Mac like the enlightened photographers out there?”. Well, because it would be silly of me to pay for those things which I can get for free.

2007-05-06

I really could not say for sure why I decided to distort the whole QingMing photo collection. It really is a shift for me, for usually, I am a pretty standard issue, depict real life, photojournalistic type of photographer. Usually, I just want to document what is going on, telling the story that is already in front of me.

The first photo, if I remember correctly, that I distorted was “Say What”. Something about the colors and subject matter just jumped out at me when I shot it, and I wanted it to jump out at others, too. Really, though, all the original photos from that day had some strange coloring already. I still cannot quite figure out what was going on. I am guessing it was just the bright sunlight. One thing is for sure: mountainside graveyards at midday are not the best lighting situations.