Next Lens After the Cheap Kit Lens

This is an e-mail from a friend of mine and I could not help but put a couple of my comments to it here online so that more people could benefit from it.

[My wife] got the D40, it was an eBay buy. I wish that we had a better lens, it came with a lower end model. We are saving up and hoping to get a better one soon, they are all just so stinking expensive. It has been great, though, being able to catch those moments with [our kid] that you normally wouldn’t because of the slow shutter speed on the point and shoot digital. I know there are some ways to tweaking the camera so you can get a little better shot out of it, but I haven’t had the chance to play with it enough.

What new lens should my friend buy? Are there some not so expensive lenses out there for amateur photographers on a limited budget? I have just the answer.

Since we are speaking of a Nikon D40 (and the D60 would be the same answer), I would highly suggest a lens that Nikon just came out with a few months ago: AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 G. That is techy gibberish to many of you, so I will break that down and tell you how that applies, but first, I will give the simple explanation.

The “standard” lens for 35mm film cameras is a 50mm lens, and it is standard because it gives a perspective very close to what the human eye would. That standard is dependent on the size of the film or sensor, though. Most digital cameras out there (except for some of the pro-level ones) have a smaller sized sensor, and the stardard length of lens is no longer 50mm. On the smaller-sized-sensor digital SLRs out there today (regardless of brand), a 35mm lens is going to give that standard perspective. Basically that standard perspective is not too telephoto (long) nor is it too wide angle (short). It is in the middle and great for wide variety of everyday shots.

So, that Nikon lens mentioned above is made specifically for the smaller sized sensor cameras. You get that standard perspective, with a very wide open aperture (that is the f/1.8 part), at a very cheap price ($200). That is a steal.

Nikon and CanonĀ also have out cheap 50mm prime (fixed focal length, non-zoom lenses) lenses with a nice, open aperture: AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D and Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II. And when I say cheap, I am talking $100 kind of cheap. (note: See the comments below; Nikon D40, D40x, and D60 cannot auto focus with the 50mm f/1.8). It is a great addition if you just need more light than that cheapo kit lens will give you. The only downside is that 50mm on a smaller sensor is a little too long of a lens for many situations. Just set your kit lens to 50mm all day and shoot around and see what you think. Do the same at 35mm and see which you like better.

I talk a lot about aperture because it is really the most important part of the lens choosing process. The smaller that number, the bigger the aperture (hole), the more light the lens will let in. If the aperture is more open, that means either shutter speed can increase taking care of your blur problem or your ISO (film speed) can decrease thus keeping grain out of your photos. Lens prices are basically set by the aperture…just look for yourself.

The prices are great on these lenses, and you really get great quality for the money. More than likely, you will find yourself using this fixed length prime lens much more than your zoom lens. Once you get used to that wide open aperture, it is hard to go back.

Cooper Strange Written by:

7 Comments

  1. 2009-03-11

    I forgot to specifically write out what all the techy gibberish meant in that lens name: AF-S – the focusing motor is in the lens, instead of in the body of the camera, and is much more quiet and fast. DX – this lens fits the small sized sensor cameras only. G – no aperture ring (like you would need on an old manual camera to change aperture).

    At first the G seemed confusing because all AF-S lenses lack the aperture ring anyway. Then after some looking, I realized that some AF lenses (motor not in the lens) are G and some are D…for what it’s worth.

  2. Kevin
    2009-03-12

    One other huge downside of the 50mm f/1.8 to remember — it won’t autofocus on your D40.

  3. Ryan
    2009-03-12

    Why won’t it auto focus? From what I have been reading, it’s not even released yet.

  4. Ryan
    2009-03-12

    Never mind, I confused the 35mm and the 50mm.

  5. 2009-03-12

    Oh, Kevin, you are right. I totally forgot. I got to thinking about the Canon lens on entry level Canon DSLRs, which is not a problem, and forgot the main reason Nikon made that new AF-S DX 35mm. It was specifically to solve this problem.

    They also just released a AF-S 50mm, if somebody really wanted the 50mm length on their D40, D40x, or D60, but then you have officially left the budget lens class, because that is an f/1.4 and is fairly expensive, and really intended for a different crowd to solve different issues (fast focus, quiet focus, more light).

    Basically, a lot of these lenses “work” on the D40 and D60, but they just do not autofocus. For that to happen, you have to have a lens with the focusing motor in the lens, which in my first comment, you can see is distinguished by the AF-S mark. The AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D is not AF-S, but only AF.

  6. 2009-03-12

    I just realized this lens is not actually out on the shelves yet. I had not realized how important this lens really is going to be for D40/D40x/D60 users and how big of a hole it really does fill in the Nikon lens lineup. It will be on the shelves soon, though.

    I have the 35mm f/2 D, though. I love it. I love the perspective. I wish it were brighter, but alas, we do what we can.

Comments are closed.